Peer Review Process
All manuscripts submitted to the Journal of Tropical Agricultural Innovation (JTAI) undergo a peer review process to ensure scientific quality, originality, and relevance to the journal’s scope.
1. Initial Editorial Screening
-
Upon submission, the Editor-in-Chief and Editorial Board conduct an initial assessment to check topic relevance, formatting, and document completeness.
-
Manuscripts that do not comply with the journal’s scope or format may be returned to authors for revision before peer review.
-
All submissions are screened using plagiarism detection software (e.g., Turnitin). Manuscripts with a similarity index above 20% will be returned or rejected.
2. Peer Review Process
-
JTAI applies a double-blind review system, meaning both authors and reviewers remain anonymous to each other.
-
Each manuscript is reviewed by at least two independent reviewers who are experts in the relevant field.
-
Reviewers evaluate the following criteria:
-
Originality and scientific contribution
-
Relevance to the journal’s focus and scope
-
Soundness of methodology
-
Clarity of results and discussion
-
Accuracy and completeness of references
-
Quality of writing and presentation
-
3. Reviewer Recommendations
Reviewers may recommend one of the following decisions:
-
Accepted: the manuscript is accepted without revision.
-
Minor Revision: minor changes are required before acceptance.
-
Major Revision: significant revisions are required before further consideration.
-
Rejected: the manuscript is not suitable for publication in this journal.
4. Author Revisions
-
Authors are given 10–20 working days to revise their manuscripts according to reviewer comments.
-
A response to reviewers document must accompany the revised manuscript, detailing the changes made.
-
Revised manuscripts may be re-evaluated by reviewers if necessary.
5. Final Decision
-
The Editor-in-Chief makes the final decision on manuscript acceptance, considering reviewers’ recommendations and editorial judgment.
-
Accepted manuscripts will proceed to copyediting, layout editing, and proofreading before open access publication.
6. Review Timeline
-
The entire review process typically takes 4–8 weeks, depending on the responsiveness of reviewers and authors.
-
JTAI is committed to maintaining transparency, objectivity, and timeliness throughout the review and publication process.